I am yet to find someone in the Text Response sticky or in my school who has done the second prompt.
Who doesn't like structure? It was so open to a great discussion!
Why did you pick the topic you chose for Year of Wonders - both of which, mind you, purported to complex discussions.
The prompts were:
i. "In the end, I did not make the choice so much as have it made for me."
Is this true of other characters in the village?
ii. How does Brooks develop a sense of time and of place in this novel?
I answered the second prompt. I basically said that Brooks structures the text specifically in medias res to allow the reader to better chart the growth of the characters with a final image in mind, whilst also using the metastructural elements of chapter titles to convey the seasons and give a sense of temporal rather than physical time. The other half of my essay was to do with the descriptors of the place as a remote village in Derbyshire, and to justify this 'sense of place' I basically said that the author frequently revisits the same places in the text (the Miner's Tavern, the Cucklett Delf, the Rectory, etc) to establish the idea that the village is small. Similarly, anything past 'Boundary Stone', such as the village of Bakewell, is narrated by Anna to be intangible. The far off and unheard of tales of London iterated by George Viccars also serve to contrast the dank and musky environments of the cities streets with the expansive pastures and harsh topology of the village.
Then to summarise it all I basically said that Brooks utilises these elements to accentuate Anna's growth and show that I can actually deal with non-structural elements of the text... basically said that her growth from a subservient widow into an adoptive mother, scholar, and doctor free from the shackles of domineering males and religious dogma is made all the more amazing by the fact that she was a woman in a remote 16th century village. In terms of time I just basically explained that Brooks' intentional structuring of the novel in media res allows the audience to chart Anna's growth with a final image in mind, all the more effectively mapping it.
I was obviously nowhere near as clear as I am here, writing it relaxedly for you guys to critique because it was the first essay I wrote and my heart was going at 140bpm by 10:15am when I was only halfway through. Hoping for a 14/20+ because it was fluent albeit but a lot of the language being convoluted, and I didn't "wrap it up" into a nice and neat package for the examiner - a lot of what I was trying to say was implicit and lacked conviction.
Anyhoo, the evidence was there and I'm hoping they lap it up.