Author Topic: Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?  (Read 139 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MuggedByReality

  • Victorian
  • Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 615
  • Respect: +4
  • Referral Points: 0
Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?
« on: April 15, 2011, 12:32:20 AM »
0


      The maker of the video has thinks so; the writer of the article trenchantly disagrees.
 
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100082724/anti-free-schools-fanatic-scores-spectacular-own-goal/
"People living deeply have no fear of death"
                                      -Anais Nin

"In the 2nd grade, they asked us what we wanted to be. I said I wanted to be a ballplayer and they laughed. In the 8th grade they asked the same question and I said a ballplayer again and they laughed a little more. By the 11th grade no one was laughing."
  -Johnny Bench, Hall of Fame baseball player


Offline EvangelionZeta

  • Quintessence of Dust
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 2060
  • Gender: Female
  • Respect: +123
  • Referral Points: 0
  • Grad Year: 2010
  • School: Melbourne Girls' Grammar School
Re: Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2011, 07:20:50 PM »
0
Modernizing Shakespeare alters the meaning of it all - half of Shakespeare is the language...
2009-2010 - VCE, Premier's Awards in Literature and Classics
2011-2014 - PhB (ANU), Majoring in English and Philosophy

Offline Eriny

  • The lamp of enlightenment
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
  • Gender: Female
  • Respect: +77
  • Referral Points: 0
Re: Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2011, 11:06:25 AM »
0
I think that providing 'translations' so that students can follow the basic story is a good idea, but I agree that if you want to actually enjoy Shakespeare, you do have to read the non-modernised version. Or see it performed.